01 · Enquiry
Capture the requested job
Customer, quantity, dimensions, material, finishing, due date and attached artwork are placed into a structured draft. Missing information stays visibly missing.
Connect the information already present in the enquiry, quote and approved proof so your team verifies each handoff instead of typing the same job again. Pricing judgement, artwork and customer approval stay with the people responsible for them.
Fixed scopeQuoted before work starts
Human controlDecisions stay with your team
Honest boundaryKeep existing systems where they work
The useful record already exists by the time a job reaches the floor. The problem is that its fields are scattered across an email, a quote, an artwork file, an approval reply and a handwritten note. We establish which record owns each field, then carry confirmed information forward.
01 · Enquiry
Customer, quantity, dimensions, material, finishing, due date and attached artwork are placed into a structured draft. Missing information stays visibly missing.
02 · Quote
Repeatable items are priced from the rate card or rules you already use. Anything that needs estimator judgement waits for the estimator rather than being invented.
03 · Proof
The proof, the job reference and the customer conversation remain linked so the team can see which version is actually awaiting approval.
04 · Approval
Approval is logged against the correct proof. Silence, a delivery receipt or an unrelated reply is never treated as permission to produce.
05 · Job ticket
The approved specification becomes the production ticket with finishing, due date and artwork link intact. Exceptions remain marked for review.
06 · Status
A board can show queued, proofing, approved, in production and complete—but only from events your team can record reliably.
This is an illustrative workflow. The exact fields and approval points come from your own process, not a generic print template.
A made-to-order job is not a commodity order. The system should reduce clerical repetition while making the points that need experience easier to see.
Good automation candidates
Human decisions retained
The existing-system rule: if your MIS already moves an accepted quote into a complete job ticket, we do not rebuild that feature. We look for the unsupported handoff around it, or tell you the process is already covered.
Automation project
Quoted separately or excluded
When we would tell you not to buy: if every job is genuinely priced from fresh judgement, proof approvals return promptly and the accepted specification already creates the ticket, another automation layer would add maintenance without removing meaningful work.
Usually not. We first check whether it offers a supported import, export or API and whether the missing work sits before or after it. Connection is normally safer than replacement.
No. It can apply rules you can state and surface what does not fit them. A genuinely unusual job stays with the estimator; the system should not disguise a guess as a price.
It can be recorded from an explicit response linked to the correct proof version. Silence and ambiguous replies remain unresolved for a person to check.
Only when a named machine, RIP or MIS exposes a supported route that we have assessed and included in writing. Machine integration is never assumed from a sales call.
Based in Horsham, we work on site across Sussex and Surrey. Explore the practical starting points for businesses in Worthing.
The first call is fifteen minutes and free. We will trace the handoffs and tell you whether there is a sensible first automation—or whether your existing system already does enough.
If the honest answer is that the process needs the system rebuilt rather than one step automated, that is a bespoke quote, proof and job-ticket system.