Skip to main content
Commercial printers · Sign makers · Wide-format shops

Workflow automation for commercial printers

Connect the information already present in the enquiry, quote and approved proof so your team verifies each handoff instead of typing the same job again. Pricing judgement, artwork and customer approval stay with the people responsible for them.

Fixed scopeQuoted before work starts

Human controlDecisions stay with your team

Honest boundaryKeep existing systems where they work

The same job, without six versions of its specification

The useful record already exists by the time a job reaches the floor. The problem is that its fields are scattered across an email, a quote, an artwork file, an approval reply and a handwritten note. We establish which record owns each field, then carry confirmed information forward.

01 · Enquiry

Capture the requested job

Customer, quantity, dimensions, material, finishing, due date and attached artwork are placed into a structured draft. Missing information stays visibly missing.

02 · Quote

Apply your existing rules

Repeatable items are priced from the rate card or rules you already use. Anything that needs estimator judgement waits for the estimator rather than being invented.

03 · Proof

Keep versions together

The proof, the job reference and the customer conversation remain linked so the team can see which version is actually awaiting approval.

04 · Approval

Record an explicit decision

Approval is logged against the correct proof. Silence, a delivery receipt or an unrelated reply is never treated as permission to produce.

05 · Job ticket

Carry confirmed fields forward

The approved specification becomes the production ticket with finishing, due date and artwork link intact. Exceptions remain marked for review.

06 · Status

Show what is actually happening

A board can show queued, proofing, approved, in production and complete—but only from events your team can record reliably.

One made-to-order job, followed from inbox to floor

This is an illustrative workflow. The exact fields and approval points come from your own process, not a generic print template.

A repeat exhibition-panel order with a changed size

Enquiry arrives
The email, requested dimensions, quantity, deadline and artwork attachment receive one job reference.
Quote is drafted
Known material and finishing rules are applied; the changed size is highlighted for the estimator to confirm.
Proof goes out
The proof version and sent time are recorded against the same job rather than in a separate inbox trail.
Customer approves
The explicit approval is attached to that version. A requested amendment returns the job to proofing instead.
Ticket reaches production
Only confirmed specification fields are carried forward, with the approved artwork linked and unresolved items still visible.

Automate the handoff, not the judgement

A made-to-order job is not a commodity order. The system should reduce clerical repetition while making the points that need experience easier to see.

Good automation candidates

Facts already agreed

  • Copying customer and job details
  • Applying documented rate-card rules
  • Chasing an outstanding proof
  • Generating a ticket from approved fields
  • Showing a recorded production state

Human decisions retained

Work that needs authority or craft

  • Pricing an exception or unusual substrate
  • Assessing or amending artwork
  • Approving on the customer's behalf
  • Choosing a production method
  • Accepting an unresolved specification

The existing-system rule: if your MIS already moves an accepted quote into a complete job ticket, we do not rebuild that feature. We look for the unsupported handoff around it, or tell you the process is already covered.

A bounded build, with the exclusions written down

Automation project

Fixed price from £1,495

  • Current handoff mapped before the build
  • Named input, output and review points
  • Connection to supported exports or interfaces
  • Working system, documentation and code you own

Quoted separately or excluded

No vague “end-to-end” promise

  • New MIS, RIP or machine integration
  • Writing a rate card that does not exist
  • Artwork production or pre-flight decisions
  • Hardware, scanners and wall screens
  • Shop-floor process change

When we would tell you not to buy: if every job is genuinely priced from fresh judgement, proof approvals return promptly and the accepted specification already creates the ticket, another automation layer would add maintenance without removing meaningful work.

Questions printers and sign makers ask

Do we need to replace our print MIS?

Usually not. We first check whether it offers a supported import, export or API and whether the missing work sits before or after it. Connection is normally safer than replacement.

Can it price every custom job?

No. It can apply rules you can state and surface what does not fit them. A genuinely unusual job stays with the estimator; the system should not disguise a guess as a price.

Can approval be taken from an email?

It can be recorded from an explicit response linked to the correct proof version. Silence and ambiguous replies remain unresolved for a person to check.

Will this connect to our machines?

Only when a named machine, RIP or MIS exposes a supported route that we have assessed and included in writing. Machine integration is never assumed from a sales call.

Built and supported locally

Based in Horsham, we work on site across Sussex and Surrey. Explore the practical starting points for businesses in Worthing.

Bring one recent job that was typed twice

The first call is fifteen minutes and free. We will trace the handoffs and tell you whether there is a sensible first automation—or whether your existing system already does enough.